Will Nepal lose Everest to the Chinese?

by Dave from The Longest Way Home ~ June 6th, 2018. Published in: Travel blog » Nepal.
Mount Everest seen from the Nepal side

Time’s up for Nepal’s “exclusive” access to Mount Everest, China is getting ready to launch its own resorts on the other side of the world’s tallest mountain

Nepal and China still share Mount Everest, for now

There’s an invisible border at the top of Everest between Tibet (China) and Nepal. Back in the 1950s when the British were going full on to be the first to the top there was real concern the Chinese would have issues with the “Illegal border crossing”. Of course none of that happened. Hillary (New Zealand) and Tenzing (Nepal) stood at the top of the world’s highest peak and that was that.

During this early period Nepal had just opened its doors to the outside world again while China was closing off Tibet’s. Nepal got off to a head start in terms of mountaineering and trekking tourism.

Since then Nepal has largely made both climbing Everest and trekking to Everest Base Camp the backbone of its tourism industry. All that, is about to change.

How & why Nepal’s tourism infrastructure is based around Everest

It’s the world’s tallest mountain. It has an allure. People either want to see it, climb it or photograph it. Since Lukla airport (Tenzing-Hillary Airport) opened in 1964 the time required to reach Everest halved. What was once a remote mountain area suddenly became accessible to all. Nepal had a tourism gold mine on its hands.

Despite Royal and Political upheaval the trekking industry boomed. In 12-14 days you could go from Kathmandu to Everest Base Camp and Everest. The legendary stories, the magnificent photographs were all there. Nepal really didn’t need to do much else to lure in tourists.

Royal Bengal Tiger in Bardia

Nepal has wildlife experiences like nowhere else on earth, yet …

The other tourism options in Nepal seemed to take a back seat for many years with a strange notion of Everest popping in everywhere:

  • Despite the fact that there are eight of the worlds tallest mountains in Nepal. All everyone focuses on is the tallest one. 
  • The entire middle belt of Nepal is filled with mystical temples, monuments, shrines and valleys. Nothing happened aside from rising pollutions levels. Where’s the trekking permit office behind all the haze?
  • The southern area has vast jungles filled with tigers, rhinos and elephants that put most African safaris to shame. Can you see Everest from there?

It’s not hard to understand that when all everyone thinks about is “Everest” why would you bother with the rest?

Nepal’s second saving grace in terms of trekking, the Annapurna Circuit, largely came about from people trying to find an alternative to Everest. So, what happened? A road was built alongside it.

The Red Dragon Awakens

Tibet has been a thorny issue for China since the 50s. The state is constantly in and out of closed off status. In March 2008 there was a second uprising. They shut everything down again. Now, ten years later the doors are open again.

The smooth comfortable road to Everest in Tibet

The smooth comfortable road to Everest in Tibet … I’m not sure a road like this even exists in Nepal …

Tibet’s infrastructure has been radically improved. Long, smooth roads. Bright shiny lights. Health care and a tourism industry ready to boom. China is a patient, well planned out country. While having the power to crack down physically on Tibet as they have done in the past, they also tempt it with the idea of being a better more prosperous land.

Instead of uprising, promote Tibet as a magnificent place to travel. I’ve been there, it’s pretty incredible in terms of views and scenery. It’s only a matter of waiting for the right time for all this to explode into tourism. Indeed, as we speak a luxury resort is being built near the north Everest Base Camp. It’s due to be finished in 2019.

China’s New Everest Resort

For over a decade the little known secret in the world is that physically it’s very easy to reach the Tibetan Everest Base Camp. You can take a 4×4 and just walk a few hours to see it. Then come back. All nice and comfortable.

The problem has always been access to Tibet, Visas and of course cost. None of which are easy. You could book your trip to the Chinese/Tibetan Everest Base camp for next November, only to find out the Chinese have closed down access to Tibet again. Trip canceled. Not a good way to do business. For now.

New Everest Resort being built in Tibet

The new Everest Resorts are more than just one hotel … there’s a whole resort-town being built

But, plush hotels, resorts and even a mountaineering museum in Tingri are all being built (source) just 40 miles from Everest. Paved roads, a helipad, hospital. spas, restaurants and a wealth of day tours to keep tourists happen for the duration of their stay. Want to see Everest? Hop in jeep you’ll be there 10 minutes. Literally. And again, this is all opening in 2019.

There’s no doubting China is putting everything in place to make a their version of Everest Base Camp and tourism in Tibet the best experience possible. They are not interested in trekkers (yet), it’s all about package tours. Fly in, take a jeep, see nice things, stay at an Everest resort for a night. Walk outside to it (trek) or take jeep there. Go back. Go home.

It’s not idyllic, but it’s efficient.

Will China’s New Everest Resort take tourists away from Nepal?

There are two ways to look at this. In the short term, no. Nepal dominates the tourism sector with the name “Everest”. However, China has a vast marketing budget which could easily swipe Nepal’s efforts away.

Nepal still has the trekking option. This is Nepal’s saving grace. The Tibetan Everest is not a trekkers paradise. It’s a short walk. Then again, there are many people who don’t want to get all sweaty and dirty to see Everest. This is where China will again dominate Nepal.

The mountains of Tibet await

Everest and the mountains of Tibet await … it’s only a mix of visa issues and logistics that’s holding people back

China has a horrible visa requirement. Book your hotel in advance with full itineraries, apply ahead, pay ahead but only from your home country and maybe you’ll get a visa. This without doubt, puts people off visiting China or Tibet. In Nepal? Hop on a plane, arrive, pay, go visit. If China changes their tourist visa system to on arrival visas with no requirements, then it’s a whole new game.

China gets hospitality. So long as you don’t mind being on a package tour the Chinese will treat you well with clean accommodation, nice food and everything works well. Heck, you’ll probably have  100MB internet at Everest. In Nepal … well, let’s just say it’s more rough and ready. There’s internet in theory at Everest Base Camp but it’s usually only working when it feels like it.

It starts with a whisper: In 2017-2018 China once again allows tourists to travel Nepal to Tibet Overland. Some of the packages include Everest Base Camp stops. China, is indeed testing the water and already sweeping some of Nepal’s tourists up along the way.

Maybe some people already prefer the Chinese Everest to Nepal’s Everest?

Mountaineers have constantly voiced their concern about Everest from the Nepal side (source). Many talk of over crowding. Lack of regulations and safety concerns. Unexperienced climbers from all over the world are now finding it cheaper to climb Everest so the mountaineers feel the pressure of their exclusive mountain experience being subjected to a tour group mentality.

The result? People who want a better experience move to where they can find it.

In China things are run a little bit more strictly. One needs to have scaled a 8,000m peak before even applying to climb Everest from their side. There are less crowds. The temptation is there. The only hang up is the whole Tibet closed door and visa/permit issuing hurdles.

Nepal’s economy and China

There’s one thing we left out aside from tourism. Since just before the 2015 earthquake Nepal has been flirting with doing business with China. In 2016 free visas were offered to all Chinese tourists. Indeed, if you walk down Thamel today you’ll see Chinese signs everywhere.

This is three Buddha Park in Kathmandu

This is three Buddha Park in Kathmandu … there’s a lot to explore in the land where “Buddha was born – Nepal” but this side to Nepal is often neglected. Right here on The Longest Way Home I’ve created exclusive heritage walks through Kathmandu to highlight there’s more to do than just the big attractions – you’d be surprised to hear how little “support” there is for heritage in Kathmandu… now ask about Everest and everyone is talking.

Nepal, has opened the flood gates to China. New Chinese Internet is already here. Chinese roads are being built. Kathmandu Durbar Square has Chinese scaffolding with signs printed in large Chinese writing. There’s talk of a railway system linking China to Nepal and possibly India. The one belt, one road initiative offers similar proposals. The lure of Chinese wealth is said to be too much for Nepal to resist no matter the cost.

While Nepal enjoys the fruits of this new relationship, are its own fruit trees are being cut down for firewood

What’s India, Nepal’s traditional and culturally similar trading partner doing? Well, it sits in an awkward position. A long term ally that is constantly rebuffed no matter what it does. Socially in Nepal, it’s quite normal to give India a verbal tongue lashing whenever you feel like it. Meanwhile, that doesn’t happen with China. Indeed the country sitting on Nepal’s northern border does not publicly reprimand Nepal at all. It’s always seen as being “a friend”. Unlike India, who speaks it’s mind. The result is that amost everything Chinese is seen as profitable and good for Nepal. While India is seen as a constant nagging relative.

On paper, China wins Everest hands down

There’s little doubting that when you do the math virtually everything works in China’s favor. They don’t need to take Everest from Nepal because they already own its northern side. What they are doing with this part of Everest will indeed take a certain demographic of tourist away from Nepal.

Everest and the Himalayas from the Tibet side

Everest and the Himalayas from the Tibet side – will this become the most popular place to visit Everest in the future?

Imagine if China opens up trekking regions in Tibet … well, that will really stick it to Nepal. They are probably already developing this, just not talking about it, yet. The world is a big place though and with over tourism being a popular worry perhaps this would be a good thing.

What can Nepal do?

Can Nepal counter China? Sadly they might try going head on. A new Everest airport or worse yet the idea of building a road to Everest Base Camp on the Nepal side have been proposed. The road on the Annapurna Circuit has turned many off Nepal’s second iconic trekking route. But, there are plenty of certain tourists who love the idea of no exercise and the ease of hopping into a jeep instead. These are the same type of tourist with cash to spend on package tours owned by large companies. So, is it any wonder such initiatives are supported.

Could the same thing happen with Everest? Yes. The hardcore trekkers will go elsewhere while the selfie lovin’ package tourists will take the jeeps to base camp. History, does repeat itself in many guises.

To get up to Everest from the Nepal side you've got to climb this

To get up to Everest from the Nepal side you’ve got to climb this … some people would prefer to drive up …

As much as Nepal likes to tout that it has plenty of mountains to show people, the infrastructure just isn’t there. Moreover the lure of  the “Annapurna’s” is not the same as the lure of “Everest”. Not even close.

Luxury tourism and Nepal do not go hand in hand. You have to spend larger amounts of money in Nepal to get the same hospitality standards for less in other countries.  Commodities are more expensive in Nepal, so it really has a hard time offering something with high-end standards at reasonable prices. Meanwhile in China, everything works well and is relatively cheaper too.

The world’s premier eco-destination?

Nepal hasn’t quite killed off its environment yet. A reversal here could well be its ticket out of all this. Making Nepal a socially conscious and environmentally friendly tourist destination could well be its saving grace.

I’m not talking your typical “eco” friendly, responsible tourism, tree-hugging tour here. Forget the buzz words. I’m talking a full on eco-environmentally friendly country. Think, Switzerland or Iceland but on a budget.

Focusing on clean forests, pristine trails, clean cities, recyclable environments. Nepal could well become the world’s number one eco destination. Mountains to the north, heritage in the middle and jungles to the south. Everything is in place. Make it accessible to budget, mid-range and high-end tourists to really stand out.

Shiva temple in Nepal being rebuilt

Can Nepal become “the” eco-destination of Asia like Switzerland did in Europe or will it just raise prices for the same offerings?

As idyllic as all that sounds there’s a huge problem. There were once clean electric trolley buses in Kathmandu? They are gone. Replaced by smoke billowing cars, mini-buses and motorcycle. There was once a pristine trekking route in the Annapurna region, now there’s a road there. Nepal, hasn’t quite caught on to having a clean environment yet.

Nepal needs to diversify

Nepal had Everest all to itself for decades. Now, the mountain it shares with China needs to be just that … shared. Going head to head with China on its own terms is a bad idea. To beat China Nepal just needs to look at its own backyard.

Friendly people, diverse open cultures, mystical heritage, vast jungles and wildlife. Nepal literally has everything but the sea to offer.

However, such incredible sights can’t be teated the same as Everest. Unlike the “worlds tallest mountain”, they won’t sell themselves. Nepal will actually have to work hard to create, sustain, maintain and improve these attractions.

View of Himalayan Mountains

Playtime is over Nepal, you’re gonna have to share Everest soon …

Despite all this, Nepal is still pushing for 2 million tourists by 2020. Meanwhile, China has kept things low in terms of numbers while constantly improving infrastructure, health services and their tourism industry.

Is China doing what it does best and biding it’s time to pounce on these tourists after 2020?

Can Nepal diversify from being the land of just Everest?

To be honest, it no longer seems to have a choice in the matter.

 


Get my Guidebook to Nepal & discover more than anyone else!

Looking for more insider tips and information like this? Get the most up-to-date, popular and dedicated guidebook to Nepal in the world. Over 550 pages & 900+ photographs of every temple listed, daily guides on all the treks listed and so much more.

Take a look below and you’ll find out why this beats all other guidebooks!

Best guidebook to Nepal

Find out more here!


Liked this post?

Never miss a post!
   

Enter your email address:

 


20 Great responses to Will Nepal lose Everest to the Chinese?

  1. Dave it’s crazy; I had no idea China and Nepal shared Everest. Interesting. Really though I gotta say; although I adore Nepal I see why folks prefer the China side too. Safety standards and sometimes, the overall 3rd world mentality often dominating touring spots goads folks to try to make as much money as possible, even if it diminishes the experience. Then I think of places here in New Zealand where the opposite is the case; every national park is free, and some spots only allow a set number of visitors daily, like Kapiti Island, which I’m staring at as I write these words.

    • Yes, they do indeed share Everest. Trekking safety is always a concern and I think if you look at the likes of missingtrekker.com you will see that Everest Base Camp is a relatively safe trek so long as people take altitude seriously. The problem is when people rush treks more often than not.

  2. Karla says:

    Interesting! Nepal’s days are numbered for Everest it seems. I know many people who don’t want to trek but do want to visit.

    Like you say, if the Chinese make visa applications easier … I don’t see what will stand in their way.

  3. Amy Muller says:

    Nice read. I’d be worried about a too pristine environment from the Chinese side of things. It’s not my scene. But I do know many people who would love to just fly in, take a jeep, click a photo and go home telling everyone they’ve been to Everest. Interesting story to follow.

  4. Sophia B says:

    If they provide a nicer environment than the Nepali side they why not? This is not a Tibet issue, more a Nepal losing out issue. As you noted Nepal has many options but chose to continue promoting Everest for many years.

    • There’s a push for new treks in Nepal. But a new trek won’t solve the marketing issue. A full on eco trekking environment will. But it will cost short term. Long-term, Nepal could become a paradise. They need to act though. And it seems they are not interested.

  5. William Hauger says:

    I’m surprised it took the Chinese this long!

  6. Alan Merrell says:

    A deal could be reached. But I doubt it. If the mountain is on the Chinese side, there’s no reason they shouldn’t do what they want. Like you wrote, Tibet has vast mountains so trekking in Tibet could be the next thing Dave!

  7. Randolph says:

    I don’t see why the Chinese shouldn’t do this. It’s half theirs anyway. Nepal should have seen this coming years ago.

    • Yes, it’s their call all the way. It’s interesting to see how it all works out. Will be reading this post in ten years going … well, Nepal did have this option. Or, the Chinese never went with it and Nepal still runs the best Everest Treks.

  8. Sophia says:

    They offer more treks than anywhere else in Asia. Problem is none look as impressive. If one trek has a catchy ring to it I think it could catch on.

    • Yes, the only other trekking region to capture people’s imaginations is in Pakistan. Security is what’s help that area back from even getting started. But for trekking … it’s as Nepal was 20 years ago. This is something that appeals to many people. If Pakistan can become a safe place again then … they really could have a good thing happening.

  9. NoSimpleHighway says:

    Nepal will likely remain the better destination for trekkers and backpackers. It used to be possible to book Tibet tours/permits from Beijing, maybe still is. China visa is no problem from HK/Korea, but crossing into China from the south is very difficult, and often impossible

    • This year Nepal – Tibet Overland tours were started again. The issue remains that it’s a Tibet Permit and not a Chinese Visa that’s being offered. So only 18 days. So in reality people only get 10 days in China after an 8 day overland. Unless of course, they fly in. Then again if you ever visit the Chinese embassy in Kathmandu for a visa … it’s brutal and not worth the bother.

  10. Ellie Cleary says:

    Very interesting writeup! Given Nepal’s dependency on tourism economically, it is of course a worry that the country might find it difficult to survive if China manages to divert a significant number of its tourists. That said, if pressure from China can drive an approach to tourism that is more concerned with responsibility and impact of trips to everest, that would be a good thing. And a rail link between the three countries wouldn’t necessarily be a bad thing either!

    • A rail link is still sadly far away. The mountainous terrain is a huge obstacle as is maintenance.

      Recent reports out of Tibet are not so nice in terms of cultural identity. This could be a factor in Nepal too.

      Nepal’s got a lot of work to do in regards to improving tourism standards. Thailand get’s tourism largely. There are similarities. I’m just not sure why Nepal can’t learn from Thailand’s approach to budget, mid-range and high-end tourism.